Comparison
Kakaonibs vs Cacoa nibs
Overall, Kakaonibs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kakaonibs | Cacoa nibs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 617 kcal | 585 kcal |
| Fat | 54 g | 52 g |
| Saturated fat | 33 g | 30 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 17 g | 23 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kakaonibs has 60% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.5 g).
- Cacoa nibs has 26% more fiber (23 g vs 17 g).
- Kakaonibs has 14% more protein (14 g vs 12 g).
Ingredients
Kakaonibs
Not available.
Cacoa nibs
100% Kakaonibs
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kakaonibs or Cacoa nibs?
Overall, Kakaonibs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cacoa nibs has fewer calories: 585 kcal versus 617 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kakaonibs has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.