Comparison
Beetroot vs Remolacha
Overall, Remolacha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Beetroot | Remolacha |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 51 kcal | 50 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 5.2 g | 6.8 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 2.6 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Remolacha has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Remolacha has 92% less saturated fat (0 g vs 0.5 g).
- Beetroot has 23% less sugar (5.2 g vs 6.8 g).
- Remolacha has 57% more fiber (2.6 g vs 1.1 g).
Ingredients
Beetroot
cooked beetroot
Remolacha
Remolacha.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Beetroot or Remolacha?
Overall, Remolacha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Remolacha has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 51 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Beetroot has less sugar: 5.2 g versus 6.8 g per 100 g.