Remolacha cocida y pelada vs Remolacha
Overall, Remolacha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Remolacha cocida y pelada
Remolacha
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Remolacha cocida y pelada | Remolacha |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 37 kcal | 50 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 7.5 g | 6.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 2.6 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Remolacha cocida y pelada has 26% fewer calories (37 kcal vs 50 kcal).
- Remolacha has 66% more fiber (2.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Remolacha has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Remolacha cocida y pelada
Betteraves
Remolacha
Remolacha.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Remolacha cocida y pelada or Remolacha?
Overall, Remolacha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Remolacha cocida y pelada has fewer calories: 37 kcal versus 50 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Remolacha has less sugar: 6.8 g versus 7.5 g per 100 g.