Comparison
Bandnudeln vs Miolo de avelã
Overall, Miolo de avelã has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bandnudeln | Miolo de avelã |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 708 kcal | 657 kcal |
| Fat | 68 g | 63 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.7 g | 6.6 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 6.3 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bandnudeln has 14% less sugar (2.4 g vs 2.8 g).
- Miolo de avelã has 21% more fiber (6.3 g vs 5 g).
- Miolo de avelã has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Miolo de avelã lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Bandnudeln
Not available.
Miolo de avelã
Miolo de avelã
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bandnudeln or Miolo de avelã?
Overall, Miolo de avelã has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Miolo de avelã has fewer calories: 657 kcal versus 708 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bandnudeln has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.