Comparison
Bandnudeln vs Anacardos
Overall, Anacardos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bandnudeln | Anacardos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 708 kcal | 598 kcal |
| Fat | 68 g | 48.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.7 g | — |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 5.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | — |
| Protein | 17 g | 21.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Anacardos has 16% fewer calories (598 kcal vs 708 kcal).
- Anacardos has 28% less fat (48.8 g vs 68 g).
- Bandnudeln has 55% less sugar (2.4 g vs 5.3 g).
- Bandnudeln has 97% less salt (0 g vs 1 g).
- Anacardos has 21% more protein (21.6 g vs 17 g).
Ingredients
Bandnudeln
Not available.
Anacardos
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bandnudeln or Anacardos?
Overall, Anacardos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Anacardos has fewer calories: 598 kcal versus 708 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bandnudeln has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.