Comparison

Vivo Frutos Secos Nuts y Coco vs Anacardos

Overall, Vivo Frutos Secos Nuts y Coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVivo Frutos Secos Nuts y Coc...Anacardos
Nutri-Score e —
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 487 kcal 598 kcal
Fat 30.1 g 48.8 g
Saturated fat 3.1 g —
Sugars 41.1 g 5.3 g
Salt 0 g 1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 9.1 g 21.6 g
Additives20
AllergensNuts, Peanuts, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Vivo Frutos Secos Nuts y Coco has 19% fewer calories (487 kcal vs 598 kcal).
  • Vivo Frutos Secos Nuts y Coco has 38% less fat (30.1 g vs 48.8 g).
  • Anacardos has 87% less sugar (5.3 g vs 41.1 g).
  • Vivo Frutos Secos Nuts y Coco has no salt, while Anacardos has 1 g.
  • Anacardos has 58% more protein (21.6 g vs 9.1 g).
  • Only Vivo Frutos Secos Nuts y Coco lists: Nuts, Peanuts, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Vivo Frutos Secos Nuts y Coco

Almendras Tostadas, Maní Tostado, Cranberry (Cranberry, Jugo Desionizado de Piña Concentrado, Jugo de Piña Concentrado, Aceite Mineral), Coco.

Anacardos

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Vivo Frutos Secos Nuts y Coco or Anacardos?

Overall, Vivo Frutos Secos Nuts y Coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Vivo Frutos Secos Nuts y Coco has fewer calories: 487 kcal versus 598 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Anacardos has less sugar: 5.3 g versus 41.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons