Comparison
Amendoa sem pele vs Anacardos
Overall, Amendoa sem pele has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Amendoa sem pele | Anacardos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 594 kcal | 598 kcal |
| Fat | 51 g | 48.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.2 g | — |
| Sugars | 4.3 g | 5.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 7.7 g | — |
| Protein | 28 g | 21.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Amendoa sem pele has 19% less sugar (4.3 g vs 5.3 g).
- Amendoa sem pele has 97% less salt (0 g vs 1 g).
- Amendoa sem pele has 23% more protein (28 g vs 21.6 g).
Ingredients
Amendoa sem pele
AMÊNDOA crua sem pele AMENDOIM, OUTROS FRUTOS DE QUE CONTEM
Anacardos
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amendoa sem pele or Anacardos?
Overall, Amendoa sem pele has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Amendoa sem pele has fewer calories: 594 kcal versus 598 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Amendoa sem pele has less sugar: 4.3 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.