Baking powder double acting vs Baking Powder
Overall, Baking powder double acting has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baking powder double acting | Baking Powder |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 159 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 25 g | 44.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.5 g |
| Additives | 5 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Baking powder double acting has no calories, while Baking Powder has 159 kcal.
- Baking powder double acting has no fat, while Baking Powder has 0.4 g.
- Baking powder double acting has 44% less salt (25 g vs 44.3 g).
- Baking Powder has 100% more protein (2.5 g vs 0 g).
- Baking powder double acting is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Baking Powder lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Baking powder double acting
corn starch, sodium bicarbonate, sodium aluminum sulfate, monocalcium phosphate
Baking Powder
Raising agent (Disodium Diphosphate), Sodium Bicarbonate, Wheat flour
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baking powder double acting or Baking Powder?
Overall, Baking powder double acting has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Baking powder double acting has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 159 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Baking powder double acting has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.