Baking Powder vs Baking powder double acting
Overall, Baking Powder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baking Powder | Baking powder double acting |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 20.8 g | 25 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 4 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Baking Powder has 17% less salt (20.8 g vs 25 g).
Ingredients
Baking Powder
CORN STARCH, SODIUM BICARBONATE, MONOCALCIUM PHOSPHATE
Baking powder double acting
corn starch, sodium bicarbonate, sodium aluminum sulfate, monocalcium phosphate
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baking Powder or Baking powder double acting?
Overall, Baking Powder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Baking Powder has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 0 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Baking Powder has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.