Backoblden vs Śląskie oblaty orzechowe
Overall, Backoblden has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Backoblden | Śląskie oblaty orzechowe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 363 kcal | 434 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 9.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 9.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.8 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 10.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Backoblden has 16% fewer calories (363 kcal vs 434 kcal).
- Backoblden has 89% less fat (1.1 g vs 9.7 g).
- Backoblden has 80% less sugar (2 g vs 9.8 g).
- Śląskie oblaty orzechowe has 12% more protein (10.2 g vs 9 g).
- Backoblden has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Śląskie oblaty orzechowe lists: Gluten, Nuts.
Ingredients
Backoblden
Not available.
Śląskie oblaty orzechowe
Mąka _pszenna_, cukier, olej rzepakowy, _orzechy laskowe_ prażone 2%, aromat.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Backoblden or Śląskie oblaty orzechowe?
Overall, Backoblden has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Backoblden has fewer calories: 363 kcal versus 434 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Backoblden has less sugar: 2 g versus 9.8 g per 100 g.