Comparison

Backoblden vs Śląskie oblaty orzechowe

Overall, Backoblden has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBackobldenŚląskie oblaty orzechowe
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 363 kcal 434 kcal
Fat 1.1 g 9.7 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.7 g
Sugars 2 g 9.8 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 2.8 g
Protein 9 g 10.2 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten, Nuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Backoblden has 16% fewer calories (363 kcal vs 434 kcal).
  • Backoblden has 89% less fat (1.1 g vs 9.7 g).
  • Backoblden has 80% less sugar (2 g vs 9.8 g).
  • Śląskie oblaty orzechowe has 12% more protein (10.2 g vs 9 g).
  • Backoblden has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Śląskie oblaty orzechowe lists: Gluten, Nuts.

Ingredients

Backoblden

Not available.

Śląskie oblaty orzechowe

Mąka _pszenna_, cukier, olej rzepakowy, _orzechy laskowe_ prażone 2%, aromat.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Backoblden or Śląskie oblaty orzechowe?

Overall, Backoblden has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Backoblden has fewer calories: 363 kcal versus 434 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Backoblden has less sugar: 2 g versus 9.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons