Comparison
Backoblden vs Śląskie oblaty czosnkowe
Overall, Backoblden has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Backoblden | Śląskie oblaty czosnkowe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 363 kcal | 388 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 3.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 4.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.7 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 11.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Backoblden has 66% less fat (1.1 g vs 3.2 g).
- Backoblden has 57% less sugar (2 g vs 4.7 g).
- Backoblden has 100% less salt (0 g vs 2.3 g).
- Śląskie oblaty czosnkowe has 23% more protein (11.7 g vs 9 g).
- Backoblden has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Śląskie oblaty czosnkowe lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Backoblden
Not available.
Śląskie oblaty czosnkowe
Mąka _pszenna_, czosnek suszony 3%, sól, olej rzepakowy, _mleko_ odtłuszczone w proszku.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Backoblden or Śląskie oblaty czosnkowe?
Overall, Backoblden has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Backoblden has fewer calories: 363 kcal versus 388 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Backoblden has less sugar: 2 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Śląskie oblaty czosnkowe vs Śląskie Oblaty Kawowe
Backoblden vs Śląskie Oblaty Kawowe
Backoblden vs Backoblaten
Backoblden vs Śląskie Oblaty smak wani...
Backoblaten vs Śląskie oblaty czosnkowe
Śląskie oblaty czosnkowe vs Śląskie Oblaty smak wani...
Śląskie oblaty czosnkowe vs Śląskie oblaty cebulowe
Śląskie oblaty czosnkowe vs Śląskie oblaty cynamonow...