Backoblden vs Backoblaten
Overall, Backoblaten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Backoblden | Backoblaten |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 363 kcal | 363 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 5.3 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Backoblaten has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Backoblaten lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Backoblden
Not available.
Backoblaten
Weizenmehl, Stärke.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Backoblden or Backoblaten?
Overall, Backoblaten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Backoblden has fewer calories: 363 kcal versus 363 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Backoblden has less sugar: 2 g versus 2 g per 100 g.