Comparison

Backoblaten vs Śląskie oblaty czosnkowe

Overall, Backoblaten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBackoblatenŚląskie oblaty czosnkowe
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 363 kcal 388 kcal
Fat 1.1 g 3.2 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.5 g
Sugars 2 g 4.7 g
Salt 0 g 2.3 g
Fiber 5.3 g 2.7 g
Protein 9 g 11.7 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Backoblaten has 66% less fat (1.1 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Backoblaten has 57% less sugar (2 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Backoblaten has 100% less salt (0 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Backoblaten has 49% more fiber (5.3 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Śląskie oblaty czosnkowe has 23% more protein (11.7 g vs 9 g).
  • Backoblaten has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Śląskie oblaty czosnkowe lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Backoblaten

Weizenmehl, Stärke.

Śląskie oblaty czosnkowe

Mąka _pszenna_, czosnek suszony 3%, sól, olej rzepakowy, _mleko_ odtłuszczone w proszku.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Backoblaten or Śląskie oblaty czosnkowe?

Overall, Backoblaten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Backoblaten has fewer calories: 363 kcal versus 388 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Backoblaten has less sugar: 2 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons