Comparison

Avena Integral Instantánea vs Kimilho Flocão

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAvena Integral InstantáneaKimilho Flocão
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 402 kcal 354 kcal
Fat 8.3 g 2 g
Saturated fat 1.4 g 0 g
Sugars 1.2 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 9.7 g 0 g
Protein 13.1 g 6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kimilho Flocão has 12% fewer calories (354 kcal vs 402 kcal).
  • Kimilho Flocão has 76% less fat (2 g vs 8.3 g).
  • Kimilho Flocão has no saturated fat, while Avena Integral Instantánea has 1.4 g.
  • Kimilho Flocão has no sugar, while Avena Integral Instantánea has 1.2 g.
  • Avena Integral Instantánea has 100% more fiber (9.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Avena Integral Instantánea has 54% more protein (13.1 g vs 6 g).
  • Avena Integral Instantánea has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Avena Integral Instantánea

Avena laminada.

Kimilho Flocão

farinha de milho*. *Ingrediente contendo genes de Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Bacillus thuringiensis, Streptomyces viridochromogenes e Zea mays.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Avena Integral Instantánea or Kimilho Flocão?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kimilho Flocão has fewer calories: 354 kcal versus 402 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kimilho Flocão has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons