Avena Integral Instantánea vs Kimilho Flocão
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Avena Integral Instantánea | Kimilho Flocão |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 402 kcal | 354 kcal |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9.7 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 13.1 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kimilho Flocão has 12% fewer calories (354 kcal vs 402 kcal).
- Kimilho Flocão has 76% less fat (2 g vs 8.3 g).
- Kimilho Flocão has no saturated fat, while Avena Integral Instantánea has 1.4 g.
- Kimilho Flocão has no sugar, while Avena Integral Instantánea has 1.2 g.
- Avena Integral Instantánea has 100% more fiber (9.7 g vs 0 g).
- Avena Integral Instantánea has 54% more protein (13.1 g vs 6 g).
- Avena Integral Instantánea has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Avena Integral Instantánea
Avena laminada.
Kimilho Flocão
farinha de milho*. *Ingrediente contendo genes de Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Bacillus thuringiensis, Streptomyces viridochromogenes e Zea mays.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Avena Integral Instantánea or Kimilho Flocão?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kimilho Flocão has fewer calories: 354 kcal versus 402 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kimilho Flocão has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.