Comparison

Aubergines cuisinées à la tomate vs Aubergines farcies au riz

Overall, Aubergines farcies au riz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAubergines cuisinées à la to...Aubergines farcies au riz
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 121 kcal 59 kcal
Fat 9.2 g 3.7 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 0.5 g
Sugars 4.6 g 2 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.7 g
Fiber 1.8 g 1.8 g
Protein 1.4 g 1.1 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Aubergines farcies au riz has 51% fewer calories (59 kcal vs 121 kcal).
  • Aubergines farcies au riz has 60% less fat (3.7 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Aubergines farcies au riz has 55% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Aubergines farcies au riz has 57% less sugar (2 g vs 4.6 g).
  • Aubergines cuisinées à la tomate is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Aubergines cuisinées à la tomate

Aubergines* en tranches frites (50% minimum), tomate* 35% (pulpe*, concentré*), eau, huile de tournesol* désodorisée, oignons*, sucre de canne* non raffiné, ail*, sel de mer, échalote*, épices* *ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique. Souligné : issu du commerce équitable.

Aubergines farcies au riz

Tomaten (35%), Auberginen (34%), Zwiebeln, Reis (7%), Sonnenblumenöl, Gewürze, Knoblauch, Salz, modifizierte Maisstärke, Zucker, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Aubergines cuisinées à la tomate or Aubergines farcies au riz?

Overall, Aubergines farcies au riz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Aubergines farcies au riz has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 121 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Aubergines farcies au riz has less sugar: 2 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons