Comparison

Aubergine and Mozzarella Gratin vs Chicken Tinga

Overall, Chicken Tinga has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAubergine and Mozzarella Gra...Chicken Tinga
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group — 4
Calories 116 kcal 91 kcal
Fat 6.8 g 4 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 0.9 g
Sugars 4.4 g 3 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.7 g
Fiber 2.1 g 1.6 g
Protein 2.5 g 7.6 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedChicken, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chicken Tinga has 21% fewer calories (91 kcal vs 116 kcal).
  • Chicken Tinga has 41% less fat (4 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Chicken Tinga has 42% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Chicken Tinga has 31% less sugar (3 g vs 4.4 g).
  • Aubergine and Mozzarella Gratin has 27% more fiber (2.1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Chicken Tinga has 66% more protein (7.6 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Chicken Tinga has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Chicken Tinga lists: Chicken, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Aubergine and Mozzarella Gratin

Not available.

Chicken Tinga

Chicken (27%), Tomato (22%), Black Beans (22%), Onions, Carrots, Garlic, Chipotle Peppers [Water, Salt, Sugar, Onion, Acetic Acid], Lime Juice (sulphites), Salt, Cumin, Paprika, Chicken Bouillon [salt, palm oil, potato Starch, yeast extract, sugar,dehydrated chicken meat (4%), chicken fat, natural flavourings, turmeric, colouring (plain caramel)], Vegetable Oil

FAQ

Which is healthier: Aubergine and Mozzarella Gratin or Chicken Tinga?

Overall, Chicken Tinga has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chicken Tinga has fewer calories: 91 kcal versus 116 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chicken Tinga has less sugar: 3 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons