Toad In The Hole vs Chicken Tinga
Overall, Chicken Tinga has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Toad In The Hole | Chicken Tinga |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 243 kcal | 91 kcal |
| Fat | 10.5 g | 4 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 12.2 g | 7.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Chicken, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chicken Tinga has 62% fewer calories (91 kcal vs 243 kcal).
- Chicken Tinga has 62% less fat (4 g vs 10.5 g).
- Chicken Tinga has 74% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 3.3 g).
- Toad In The Hole has 51% more fiber (3.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Toad In The Hole has 38% more protein (12.2 g vs 7.6 g).
- Chicken Tinga has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Chicken Tinga lists: Chicken, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Toad In The Hole
Not available.
Chicken Tinga
Chicken (27%), Tomato (22%), Black Beans (22%), Onions, Carrots, Garlic, Chipotle Peppers [Water, Salt, Sugar, Onion, Acetic Acid], Lime Juice (sulphites), Salt, Cumin, Paprika, Chicken Bouillon [salt, palm oil, potato Starch, yeast extract, sugar,dehydrated chicken meat (4%), chicken fat, natural flavourings, turmeric, colouring (plain caramel)], Vegetable Oil
FAQ
Which is healthier: Toad In The Hole or Chicken Tinga?
Overall, Chicken Tinga has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chicken Tinga has fewer calories: 91 kcal versus 243 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chicken Tinga has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.