Comparison

Amandes California en poudre vs Almond flour

Overall, Amandes California en poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Amandes California en poudre	Almond flour
Nutri-Score	a	c
NOVA group	1	1
Calories	628 kcal	600 kcal
Fat	52.9 g	46.7 g
Saturated fat	4.3 g	3.3 g
Sugars	4 g	6.7 g
Salt	0 g	0 g
Fiber	7.6 g	13.3 g
Protein	28.5 g	20 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	Nuts	Nuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Almond flour has 12% less fat (46.7 g vs 52.9 g).
Almond flour has 22% less saturated fat (3.3 g vs 4.3 g).
Amandes California en poudre has 40% less sugar (4 g vs 6.7 g).
Almond flour has 43% more fiber (13.3 g vs 7.6 g).
Amandes California en poudre has 30% more protein (28.5 g vs 20 g).
Amandes California en poudre has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Amandes California en poudre

Amandes 100%

Almond flour

blanched almond flour

FAQ

Which is healthier: Amandes California en poudre or Almond flour?

Overall, Amandes California en poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Almond flour has fewer calories: 600 kcal versus 628 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Amandes California en poudre has less sugar: 4 g versus 6.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Amandes California en po... vs Poudre d’amande bio Amandes California en po... vs Farine d'amandes Bio émo... Amandes poudre complète vs Amandes California en po... Poudre d’amande bio vs Almond flour Farine d'amandes Bio émo... vs Almond flour Amandes poudre complète vs Almond flour Amande poudre vs Almond flour Amandes en poudre vs Almond flour