Alfalfa vs Mixbeans edamame & soja
Overall, Alfalfa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Alfalfa | Mixbeans edamame & soja |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 29 kcal | 420 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 20.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 5.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 18.6 g |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 42.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Alfalfa has 93% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 420 kcal).
- Alfalfa has 97% less fat (0.6 g vs 20.1 g).
- Alfalfa has no saturated fat, while Mixbeans edamame & soja has 3 g.
- Alfalfa has no sugar, while Mixbeans edamame & soja has 5.8 g.
- Alfalfa has 98% less salt (0 g vs 1.6 g).
- Mixbeans edamame & soja has 90% more protein (42.2 g vs 4.2 g).
- Alfalfa has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Mixbeans edamame & soja lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Alfalfa
Not available.
Mixbeans edamame & soja
Judías de _soja_ edamame 33%, judías de _soja_ blanca 33%, judías de _soja_ negra 33%, sal 1,6%,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Alfalfa or Mixbeans edamame & soja?
Overall, Alfalfa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Alfalfa has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 420 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Alfalfa has less sugar: 0 g versus 5.8 g per 100 g.