Comparison

Alfalfa vs Mixbeans edamame & soja

Overall, Alfalfa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAlfalfaMixbeans edamame & soja
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group — —
Calories 29 kcal 420 kcal
Fat 0.6 g 20.1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 3 g
Sugars 0 g 5.8 g
Salt 0 g 1.6 g
Fiber — 18.6 g
Protein 4.2 g 42.2 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Alfalfa has 93% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 420 kcal).
  • Alfalfa has 97% less fat (0.6 g vs 20.1 g).
  • Alfalfa has no saturated fat, while Mixbeans edamame & soja has 3 g.
  • Alfalfa has no sugar, while Mixbeans edamame & soja has 5.8 g.
  • Alfalfa has 98% less salt (0 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Mixbeans edamame & soja has 90% more protein (42.2 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Alfalfa has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Mixbeans edamame & soja lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Alfalfa

Not available.

Mixbeans edamame & soja

Judías de _soja_ edamame 33%, judías de _soja_ blanca 33%, judías de _soja_ negra 33%, sal 1,6%,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Alfalfa or Mixbeans edamame & soja?

Overall, Alfalfa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Alfalfa has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 420 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Alfalfa has less sugar: 0 g versus 5.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons