Comparison
Alfalfa vs Chana Chor
Overall, Alfalfa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Alfalfa | Chana Chor |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 29 kcal | 567 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 13.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 10 g |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 13.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Alfalfa has 95% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 567 kcal).
- Alfalfa has 98% less fat (0.6 g vs 30 g).
- Alfalfa has no saturated fat, while Chana Chor has 13.3 g.
- Alfalfa has 95% less salt (0 g vs 0.6 g).
- Chana Chor has 68% more protein (13.3 g vs 4.2 g).
- Alfalfa has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Alfalfa
Not available.
Chana Chor
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Alfalfa or Chana Chor?
Overall, Alfalfa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Alfalfa has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 567 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Alfalfa has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.