Comparison

Albacore Tuna vs Migas de bonito del norte en aceite de oliva

Overall, Migas de bonito del norte en aceite de oliva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAlbacore TunaMigas de bonito del norte en...
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group — 3
Calories 258 kcal 192 kcal
Fat 17.5 g 10 g
Saturated fat 3.6 g 1.6 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.5 g 1.3 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 25.2 g 25 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Migas de bonito del norte en aceite de oliva has 26% fewer calories (192 kcal vs 258 kcal).
  • Migas de bonito del norte en aceite de oliva has 43% less fat (10 g vs 17.5 g).
  • Migas de bonito del norte en aceite de oliva has 56% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Albacore Tuna has no sugar, while Migas de bonito del norte en aceite de oliva has 0.5 g.
  • Albacore Tuna has 63% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Only Migas de bonito del norte en aceite de oliva lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Albacore Tuna

albacore tuna, extra virgin oil 32%

Migas de bonito del norte en aceite de oliva

Bonito del Norte (Atún Blanco - Thunnus alalunga) aceite de oliva y sal.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Albacore Tuna or Migas de bonito del norte en aceite de oliva?

Overall, Migas de bonito del norte en aceite de oliva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Migas de bonito del norte en aceite de oliva has fewer calories: 192 kcal versus 258 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Albacore Tuna has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons