Comparison

Alaska-Seelachsfilet vs Filets de colin d'alaska

Overall, Alaska-Seelachsfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAlaska-SeelachsfiletFilets de colin d'alaska
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 71 kcal 204 kcal
Fat 0.8 g 8.4 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.8 g
Sugars 0 g 1 g
Salt 0 g 0.5 g
Fiber 0 g 1.6 g
Protein 16 g 12 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Alaska-Seelachsfilet has 65% fewer calories (71 kcal vs 204 kcal).
  • Alaska-Seelachsfilet has 90% less fat (0.8 g vs 8.4 g).
  • Alaska-Seelachsfilet has 88% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Alaska-Seelachsfilet has no sugar, while Filets de colin d'alaska has 1 g.
  • Alaska-Seelachsfilet has no salt, while Filets de colin d'alaska has 0.5 g.
  • Filets de colin d'alaska has 100% more fiber (1.6 g vs 0 g).
  • Alaska-Seelachsfilet has 25% more protein (16 g vs 12 g).
  • Alaska-Seelachsfilet is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Filets de colin d'alaska lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Alaska-Seelachsfilet

Filets De Colin d'Alaska (Theragra Chalcogramma).

Filets de colin d'alaska

Filets de _colin d'Alaska_ MSC 65%, chapelure (farine de _blé_, levure, sel) ; huiles végétales (tournesol, colza) ; farine de _blé_ ; eau ; sel ; _gluten de blé_.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Alaska-Seelachsfilet or Filets de colin d'alaska?

Overall, Alaska-Seelachsfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Alaska-Seelachsfilet has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 204 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Alaska-Seelachsfilet has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons