Comparison

2 Plain Naans vs 2 flame baked plain naans

Overall, 2 Plain Naans has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient2 Plain Naans2 flame baked plain naans
Nutri-Score — c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 284 kcal 290 kcal
Fat 4.4 g 6.1 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 0.9 g
Sugars 1.8 g 2.4 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.9 g
Fiber 3.4 g 2.5 g
Protein 7.8 g 8.3 g
Additives76
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 2 Plain Naans has 28% less fat (4.4 g vs 6.1 g).
  • 2 Plain Naans has 25% less sugar (1.8 g vs 2.4 g).
  • 2 Plain Naans has 91% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
  • 2 Plain Naans has 26% more fiber (3.4 g vs 2.5 g).

Ingredients

2 Plain Naans

Fortified Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Niacin, Iron, Thiamin), Water, Rapeseed Oil, Yeast, Humectant: Glycerol; Spirit Vinegar, Raising Agents: Disodium Diphosphate, Sodium Hydrogen Carbonate, Calcium Phosphate; Vegetable Ghee (Palm Oil, Rapeseed Oil), Black Onion Seeds, Salt, Acidity Regulator: Citric Acid - Allergy advi Dronionate.

2 flame baked plain naans

WHEAT Flour (with Calcium Carbonate, Niacin, Iron, Thiamin), Water, Rapeseed Oil, Yeast, Spirit Vinegar, Raising Agents (Diphosphates, Sodium Carbonates, Calcium Phosphates), Vegetable Ghee (Palm Oil, Rapeseed Oil), Preservatives (Potassium Sorbate, Calcium Propionate), Kalonji Seeds, Salt, Acidity Regulator (Citric Acid), WHEAT Starch, WHEAT Flour.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 2 Plain Naans or 2 flame baked plain naans?

Overall, 2 Plain Naans has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

2 Plain Naans has fewer calories: 284 kcal versus 290 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

2 Plain Naans has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons