2 Naanbroodjes vs Naanbrød hvitløk
Overall, Naanbrød hvitløk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 2 Naanbroodjes | Naanbrød hvitløk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 271 kcal | 269 kcal |
| Fat | 3.7 g | 3.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 3.8 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 4.2 g | 4.3 g |
| Protein | 8 g | 8.1 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Naanbrød hvitløk has 42% less sugar (2.2 g vs 3.8 g).
- Naanbrød hvitløk has 48% less salt (0.6 g vs 1.2 g).
- Naanbrød hvitløk has the better Nutri-Score.
- Naanbrød hvitløk is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only 2 Naanbroodjes lists: Milk.
Ingredients
2 Naanbroodjes
65,3% tarwebloem met gerestaureerd vitamine - en mineralengehalte (99,6% tarwebloem, meelverbeteraar: calciumcarbonaat, niacine (vitamine B3), ijzer, thiamine (vitamine B1)), water, koolzaadolie, gist, brandwijnazijn, rijsmiddelen: difosfaten, natriumcarbonaten, calciumfosfaten, 0,4% gedroogde koriander, zwarte komijn, zout, conserveermiddel: calciumpropionaat, aroma,
Naanbrød hvitløk
HVETEMEL, vann, rapsolje , gjær, eddik, konserveringsmiddel (kaliumsorbat, calciumpropionat), surhetsregulerende middel (sitronsyre), hevemiddel (natriumcarbonater), koriander, svartfrø, salt, naturlig hvitløksaroma, hvitløkspulver, HVEtEstivelse.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 2 Naanbroodjes or Naanbrød hvitløk?
Overall, Naanbrød hvitløk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Naanbrød hvitløk has fewer calories: 269 kcal versus 271 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Naanbrød hvitløk has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.