Starbucks, 2 Classic Bantam Bagels
Starbucks, 2 Classic Bantam Bagels by Starbucks provides 382 kcal per 100 g, with 4.1 g of sugars and 10.8 g of protein. That is 76% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D. It is listed in the Baked goods category and comes in a 74 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 74g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 382 kcal | 283 kcal | 343 +12% | |
| Total fat | 14.9 g | 11 g | 14% | 15.2 |
| Saturated fat | 6.8 g | 5 g | 25% | 6.4 +6% |
| Carbohydrates | 51.4 g | 38 g | 14% | 47.6 +8% |
| Total sugars | 4.1 g | 3 g | 16.5 −76% | |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 2.1 −100% |
| Protein | 10.8 g | 8 g | 16% | 8 +35% |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.9 g | 1.3 −6% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 1157 Baked goods products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other baked goods
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
undefined
Product details
- Quantity
- 74 g
- Serving size
- 74g
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 7301389214736224302486
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Starbucks, 2 Classic Bantam Bagels?
Starbucks, 2 Classic Bantam Bagels contains 382 kcal per 100 g and about 283 kcal per serving (74g).
How much sugar is in Starbucks, 2 Classic Bantam Bagels?
Starbucks, 2 Classic Bantam Bagels has 4.1 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Starbucks, 2 Classic Bantam Bagels healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated February 21, 2025. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More baked goods
View all →
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
NOVA 4 
e 
e 
a NOVA 3 More from Starbucks
View all →
d NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4