View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Naturell kyllingfilet stor pakke (pålegg)
Naturell kyllingfilet stor pakke (pålegg) by Prior provides 104 kcal per 100 g, with 0.8 g of sugars and 20 g of protein. That is 63% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is B. It is listed in the Meat analogues category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 13 g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 104 kcal | 14 kcal | 204 −49% | |
| Total fat | 1.8 g | 0.2 g | 0% | 10 −82% |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g | 1% | 1.8 −72% |
| Carbohydrates | 1.9 g | 0.2 g | 0% | 11.6 −84% |
| Total sugars | 0.8 g | 0.1 g | 2.2 −63% | |
| Protein | 20 g | 2.6 g | 5% | 15.2 +32% |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 0.2 g | 1.5 +15% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 2795 Meat analogues products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other meat analogues
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Product details
- Serving size
- 13 g
- Labels & certifications
- Keyhole
- Sold in
- Norway
- Barcode
- 7039610012441
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Naturell kyllingfilet stor pakke (pålegg)?
Naturell kyllingfilet stor pakke (pålegg) contains 104 kcal per 100 g and about 14 kcal per serving (13 g).
How much sugar is in Naturell kyllingfilet stor pakke (pålegg)?
Naturell kyllingfilet stor pakke (pålegg) has 0.8 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Naturell kyllingfilet stor pakke (pålegg) healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of B (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated June 10, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 More meat analogues
View all →
a NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 More from Prior
View all →
a NOVA 1 
c NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
a