View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Muki Edamame
Muki Edamame by Two Spice AG provides 131 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 11.7 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C. It is listed in the Edamame category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 131 kcal | 202 −35% |
| Total fat | 6 g | 8.2 −27% |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 1.3 −30% |
| Carbohydrates | 8.7 g | 12.2 −28% |
| Total sugars | 0 g | 2.9 −100% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 0.1 −100% |
| Dietary fiber | 5 g | 9.2 −46% |
| Protein | 11.7 g | 18.7 −37% |
| Salt | 2 g | 0.7 +189% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 112 Edamame products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other edamame
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Zutaten: gekochte und geschälte Sojabohnen 99% (Sojabohnen [China], Salz), Salz. Ingrédients: fèves de soja cuites et écossées 99% (fèves de soja [Chine], sel), sel. Ingredienti: fagioli di soia cotti e sbucciati 99% (fagioli di soia [Cina], sale), sale. 0/100 g 548 kJ/
Product details
- Labels & certifications
- VegetarianVeganEuropean Vegetarian UnionEuropean Vegetarian Union Vegan
- Sold in
- Switzerland
- Barcode
- 7613413326877
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Muki Edamame?
Muki Edamame contains 131 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Muki Edamame?
Muki Edamame has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Muki Edamame healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Is Muki Edamame vegan?
Based on its ingredient list, it appears to be vegan. Always check the package label.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 1, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 3 
a NOVA 3 
b 
b More edamame
View all →
a NOVA 3 
a NOVA 3 
c NOVA 3 
b NOVA 1 
b NOVA 3 
b NOVA 3 