View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Maple BBQ Quarter Pounder - 2 steaks hachés
Maple BBQ Quarter Pounder - 2 steaks hachés by McDonald’s provides 292 kcal per 100 g, with 3.3 g of sugars and 18 g of protein. That is 17% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D. It is listed in the Hamburgers from fast food category and comes in a 300 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 300 g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 292 kcal | 876 kcal | 299 | |
| Total fat | 17.7 g | 53 g | 68% | 16.7 +6% |
| Saturated fat | 7.3 g | 22 g | 110% | 6.8 +8% |
| Carbohydrates | 14.7 g | 44 g | 16% | 21.3 −31% |
| Total sugars | 3.3 g | 10 g | 4 −17% | |
| Dietary fiber | 1.2 g | 3.5 g | 13% | 1.8 −36% |
| Protein | 18 g | 54 g | 108% | 15.3 +18% |
| Salt | 1 g | 3.1 g | 1.2 −17% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 23 Hamburgers from fast food products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other hamburgers from fast food
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Product details
- Quantity
- 300 g
- Serving size
- 300 g
- Sold in
- France
- Barcode
- 20400001134292
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Maple BBQ Quarter Pounder - 2 steaks hachés?
Maple BBQ Quarter Pounder - 2 steaks hachés contains 292 kcal per 100 g and about 876 kcal per serving (300 g).
How much sugar is in Maple BBQ Quarter Pounder - 2 steaks hachés?
Maple BBQ Quarter Pounder - 2 steaks hachés has 3.3 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Maple BBQ Quarter Pounder - 2 steaks hachés healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 26, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
c NOVA 3 
c 
c NOVA 4 
NOVA 3 More hamburgers from fast food
View all →
d NOVA 3 
d NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4 
NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 More from McDonald’s
View all →
c NOVA 4 
NOVA 4 
NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
c