View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Filet de panga congelé
Filet de panga congelé provides 40 kcal per 100 g, with 0.8 g of sugars and 9.6 g of protein. That is 304% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is A. It is listed in the Iridescent shark fillets category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 40 kcal | 88 −55% |
| Total fat | 0.4 g | 3 −87% |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.8 −80% |
| Carbohydrates | 0.8 g | 1.3 −37% |
| Total sugars | 0.8 g | 0.2 +304% |
| Protein | 9.6 g | 13.9 −31% |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.8 −43% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 57 Iridescent shark fillets products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other iridescent shark fillets
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Product details
- Sold in
- France
- Barcode
- 3700818915912
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Filet de panga congelé?
Filet de panga congelé contains 40 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Filet de panga congelé?
Filet de panga congelé has 0.8 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Filet de panga congelé healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of A (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 26, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a 
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 More iridescent shark fillets
View all →
a NOVA 3 
a
a 
a NOVA 4
c NOVA 4