Nutrition report ready

Carne picada de vacuno

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices for this Eroski product.

Nutri-Score A

View details

Carne picada de vacuno

by Eroski in Meats Barcode 8480010075991
Very good nutritional quality

Carne picada de vacuno by Eroski provides 170 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 20 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is A. It is listed in the Meats category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
10 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
4.8 g · Moderate
Sugars
0 g · Low
Salt
0.2 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 170 kcal 205 −17%
Total fat 10 g 12.9 −22%
Saturated fat 4.8 g 4.8
Carbohydrates 0 g 3.6 −100%
Total sugars 0 g 1 −100%
Protein 20 g 18.4 +9%
Salt 0.2 g 1.5 −87%

Category average across 3356 Meats products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other meats

Calories lower 43%
Sugars lower 1%
Salt lower 26%
Saturated fat higher 39%
Protein top 34%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Labels & certifications
No glutenNo preservativesNo coloringsNutriscoreNutriscore Grade B
Sold in
Spain
Barcode
8480010075991

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Carne picada de vacuno?

Carne picada de vacuno contains 170 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Carne picada de vacuno?

Carne picada de vacuno has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Carne picada de vacuno healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of A (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 27, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Carne picada de vacuno? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More meats

View all →

More from Eroski

View all →