Comparison

Wudy classico vs Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa

Overall, Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWudy classicoSalchichas de pavo 3% grasa
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 240 kcal 93 kcal
Fat 20 g 3 g
Saturated fat 6.1 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 2.9 g 2.3 g
Fiber — 2 g
Protein 15 g 13.1 g
Additives25
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa has 61% fewer calories (93 kcal vs 240 kcal).
  • Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa has 85% less fat (3 g vs 20 g).
  • Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa has 79% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 6.1 g).
  • Wudy classico has no sugar, while Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa has 0.5 g.
  • Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa has 21% less salt (2.3 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Wudy classico has 13% more protein (15 g vs 13.1 g).
  • Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Wudy classico

Carni pollo e tacchino separate meccanica - mente 94%, sale, aromi, antiossidanti: ascorbato di sodio, stabilizzanti: difosfati-polifosfati, con - servanti: nitrito di sodio, aroma di affumicatura.

Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa

Carne de pavo (58%), agua, fibra vegetal, sal, fécula, dextrosa, aromas, gelificantes (E-466, E-407a), estabilizador (E-451), aroma de humo, antioxidante (E-316), conservador (E-250),

FAQ

Which is healthier: Wudy classico or Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa?

Overall, Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa has fewer calories: 93 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wudy classico has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons