Parówki z filetem z indyka vs Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa
Overall, Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Parówki z filetem z indyka | Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 190 kcal | 93 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 2 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 13.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa has 51% fewer calories (93 kcal vs 190 kcal).
- Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa has 79% less fat (3 g vs 14 g).
- Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa has 70% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 4.3 g).
- Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Parówki z filetem z indyka has 30% less salt (1.6 g vs 2.3 g).
- Parówki z filetem z indyka has 13% more protein (15 g vs 13.1 g).
Ingredients
Parówki z filetem z indyka
93% mięso z indyka (w tym: 21% mięso z piersi indyka), naturalne aromaty, sól, woda, przyprawy, ekstrakty przypraw, glukoza.
Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa
Carne de pavo (58%), agua, fibra vegetal, sal, fécula, dextrosa, aromas, gelificantes (E-466, E-407a), estabilizador (E-451), aroma de humo, antioxidante (E-316), conservador (E-250),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Parówki z filetem z indyka or Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa?
Overall, Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa has fewer calories: 93 kcal versus 190 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salchichas de pavo 3% grasa has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.