Parówki z filetem z indyka vs Wudy classico
Overall, Parówki z filetem z indyka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Parówki z filetem z indyka | Wudy classico |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 190 kcal | 240 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.3 g | 6.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Parówki z filetem z indyka has 21% fewer calories (190 kcal vs 240 kcal).
- Parówki z filetem z indyka has 30% less fat (14 g vs 20 g).
- Parówki z filetem z indyka has 30% less saturated fat (4.3 g vs 6.1 g).
- Wudy classico has no sugar, while Parówki z filetem z indyka has 0.9 g.
- Parówki z filetem z indyka has 45% less salt (1.6 g vs 2.9 g).
- Parówki z filetem z indyka has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Parówki z filetem z indyka
93% mięso z indyka (w tym: 21% mięso z piersi indyka), naturalne aromaty, sól, woda, przyprawy, ekstrakty przypraw, glukoza.
Wudy classico
Carni pollo e tacchino separate meccanica - mente 94%, sale, aromi, antiossidanti: ascorbato di sodio, stabilizzanti: difosfati-polifosfati, con - servanti: nitrito di sodio, aroma di affumicatura.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Parówki z filetem z indyka or Wudy classico?
Overall, Parówki z filetem z indyka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Parówki z filetem z indyka has fewer calories: 190 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wudy classico has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.