Wudy classico vs Longaniza de Pavo
Overall, Wudy classico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wudy classico | Longaniza de Pavo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 240 kcal | 315 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.1 g | 6.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 2.9 g | 4.3 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 31 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wudy classico has 24% fewer calories (240 kcal vs 315 kcal).
- Longaniza de Pavo has 10% less fat (18 g vs 20 g).
- Wudy classico has 10% less saturated fat (6.1 g vs 6.8 g).
- Wudy classico has no sugar, while Longaniza de Pavo has 2.7 g.
- Wudy classico has 33% less salt (2.9 g vs 4.3 g).
- Longaniza de Pavo has 52% more protein (31 g vs 15 g).
- Only Longaniza de Pavo lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Wudy classico
Carni pollo e tacchino separate meccanica - mente 94%, sale, aromi, antiossidanti: ascorbato di sodio, stabilizzanti: difosfati-polifosfati, con - servanti: nitrito di sodio, aroma di affumicatura.
Longaniza de Pavo
Carne de pavo (137g para obtener 100g de producto final), grasa de pavo, leche desnatada en polvo, sal, lactosa, aromas, especias, azúcar, antioxidante (E-301), dextrosa y conservadores (E-250, E-252) y colorante (E-120).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wudy classico or Longaniza de Pavo?
Overall, Wudy classico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wudy classico has fewer calories: 240 kcal versus 315 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wudy classico has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.