Comparison

Longaniza de Pavo vs Puten Schinken

Overall, Puten Schinken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLonganiza de PavoPuten Schinken
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 315 kcal 114 kcal
Fat 18 g 2 g
Saturated fat 6.8 g 0.8 g
Sugars 2.7 g 1.2 g
Salt 4.3 g 2 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 31 g 19 g
Additives42
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Puten Schinken has 64% fewer calories (114 kcal vs 315 kcal).
  • Puten Schinken has 89% less fat (2 g vs 18 g).
  • Puten Schinken has 88% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Puten Schinken has 56% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Puten Schinken has 53% less salt (2 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Longaniza de Pavo has 39% more protein (31 g vs 19 g).
  • Puten Schinken has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Longaniza de Pavo lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Longaniza de Pavo

Carne de pavo (137g para obtener 100g de producto final), grasa de pavo, leche desnatada en polvo, sal, lactosa, aromas, especias, azúcar, antioxidante (E-301), dextrosa y conservadores (E-250, E-252) y colorante (E-120).

Puten Schinken

PUTEN-SCHINKEN gekocht :85% Putenfleisch, Trinkwasser, Speisesalz, Maltodextrin, Stabilisatoren: E450,E45 1,Gewürze, Gewürzextrakte, Antoxidationsmitel:E301;Konservierungsstoff.E250. *Ursprungsland: EU. Unter Schutzatmosphäre verpackt Nach dem Offnen zum unmittelbaren Verzehr bestimmt

FAQ

Which is healthier: Longaniza de Pavo or Puten Schinken?

Overall, Puten Schinken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Puten Schinken has fewer calories: 114 kcal versus 315 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Puten Schinken has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons