Comparison

Turkey Breakfast Sausage Patties vs Parówki z filetem z indyka

Overall, Turkey Breakfast Sausage Patties has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTurkey Breakfast Sausage Pat...Parówki z filetem z indyka
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 194 kcal 190 kcal
Fat 12.4 g 14 g
Saturated fat 3.5 g 4.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0.9 g
Salt 1.1 g 1.6 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 19.4 g 15 g
Additives20
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Turkey Breakfast Sausage Patties has 12% less fat (12.4 g vs 14 g).
  • Turkey Breakfast Sausage Patties has 18% less saturated fat (3.5 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Turkey Breakfast Sausage Patties has no sugar, while Parówki z filetem z indyka has 0.9 g.
  • Turkey Breakfast Sausage Patties has 34% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Turkey Breakfast Sausage Patties has 23% more protein (19.4 g vs 15 g).
  • Turkey Breakfast Sausage Patties has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Turkey Breakfast Sausage Patties is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Turkey Breakfast Sausage Patties

Turkey, water, contains 2% or less of: salt, spices, sugar, rosemary extract, citric acid, vinegar.

Parówki z filetem z indyka

93% mięso z indyka (w tym: 21% mięso z piersi indyka), naturalne aromaty, sól, woda, przyprawy, ekstrakty przypraw, glukoza.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Turkey Breakfast Sausage Patties or Parówki z filetem z indyka?

Overall, Turkey Breakfast Sausage Patties has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Parówki z filetem z indyka has fewer calories: 190 kcal versus 194 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Turkey Breakfast Sausage Patties has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons