Wudy classico vs Puten Schinken
Overall, Puten Schinken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wudy classico | Puten Schinken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 240 kcal | 114 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.1 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 2.9 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Puten Schinken has 53% fewer calories (114 kcal vs 240 kcal).
- Puten Schinken has 90% less fat (2 g vs 20 g).
- Puten Schinken has 87% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 6.1 g).
- Wudy classico has no sugar, while Puten Schinken has 1.2 g.
- Puten Schinken has 31% less salt (2 g vs 2.9 g).
- Puten Schinken has 21% more protein (19 g vs 15 g).
- Puten Schinken has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Wudy classico
Carni pollo e tacchino separate meccanica - mente 94%, sale, aromi, antiossidanti: ascorbato di sodio, stabilizzanti: difosfati-polifosfati, con - servanti: nitrito di sodio, aroma di affumicatura.
Puten Schinken
PUTEN-SCHINKEN gekocht :85% Putenfleisch, Trinkwasser, Speisesalz, Maltodextrin, Stabilisatoren: E450,E45 1,Gewürze, Gewürzextrakte, Antoxidationsmitel:E301;Konservierungsstoff.E250. *Ursprungsland: EU. Unter Schutzatmosphäre verpackt Nach dem Offnen zum unmittelbaren Verzehr bestimmt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wudy classico or Puten Schinken?
Overall, Puten Schinken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Puten Schinken has fewer calories: 114 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wudy classico has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.