Worcester sauce vs Curry Madras
Overall, Curry Madras has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Worcester sauce | Curry Madras |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 85 kcal | 310 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 8.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 16.2 g | 3.3 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 22.9 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 13.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Worcester sauce has 73% fewer calories (85 kcal vs 310 kcal).
- Worcester sauce has 98% less fat (0.2 g vs 8.9 g).
- Worcester sauce has 97% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 4 g).
- Curry Madras has 79% less sugar (3.3 g vs 16.2 g).
- Curry Madras has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Curry Madras has 93% more protein (13.5 g vs 1 g).
- Curry Madras has the better Nutri-Score.
- Curry Madras is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Worcester sauce lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Worcester sauce
Wasser. GERSTENMALZESSIG, Rohrzucker melasse, Zucker, Aprikosen, Zwiebeln, SOJASAUCE (Wasser, SOJABOHNEN, WEIZENMEHL, Salz). Tamarindensaftkonzentrat, Traubensaftkonzen trat, Zuckerrübensirup., Speisesalz, Knoblauch, Vanille, Nelken, Piment, Ingwer, Muskatnuss. Zimt, Orangenschale, Zitronenschale, Chili.
Curry Madras
Kurkuma, Bockshornkleesaat, Koriandersaat, Kümmel, Ingwer, Chili, Piment, Muskatnuss, Kardamon, Nelken
FAQ
Which is healthier: Worcester sauce or Curry Madras?
Overall, Curry Madras has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Worcester sauce has fewer calories: 85 kcal versus 310 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Curry Madras has less sugar: 3.3 g versus 16.2 g per 100 g.