Comparison

Cornichons vs Worcester sauce

Overall, Cornichons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCornichonsWorcester sauce
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group — 3
Calories 40 kcal 85 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 5.8 g 16.2 g
Salt 1.7 g 2.2 g
Protein 0.7 g 1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cornichons has 53% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 85 kcal).
  • Worcester sauce has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Cornichons has 64% less sugar (5.8 g vs 16.2 g).
  • Cornichons has 23% less salt (1.7 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Worcester sauce has 30% more protein (1 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Cornichons has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Worcester sauce lists: Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Cornichons

Nährwerte/ Valori nutrizionali medi o/100 Energie/Energia Fett/Grassi davon gesättigte Fettsäuren/ di cui acidi grassi saturi Kohlenhydrate/Carboidrati 7,28 davon Zucker/di cui zuccheri 588 Eiweiss/Proteine Salz/Sale gen auf das Abtropfgewicny riferito al prodotto gocciolato 168 kl/40 <0,53 <0,18 0,78 1,708 nll 9570

Worcester sauce

Wasser. GERSTENMALZESSIG, Rohrzucker melasse, Zucker, Aprikosen, Zwiebeln, SOJASAUCE (Wasser, SOJABOHNEN, WEIZENMEHL, Salz). Tamarindensaftkonzentrat, Traubensaftkonzen trat, Zuckerrübensirup., Speisesalz, Knoblauch, Vanille, Nelken, Piment, Ingwer, Muskatnuss. Zimt, Orangenschale, Zitronenschale, Chili.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cornichons or Worcester sauce?

Overall, Cornichons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cornichons has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 85 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cornichons has less sugar: 5.8 g versus 16.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons