Comparison

Wholemeal Pitta vs Soft wholemeal pittas

Overall, Soft wholemeal pittas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWholemeal PittaSoft wholemeal pittas
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 232 kcal 237 kcal
Fat 1.3 g 1.3 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.3 g
Sugars 2.5 g 1.7 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.9 g
Fiber 7.2 g 8.1 g
Protein 10 g 10 g
Additives11
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Soft wholemeal pittas has 32% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Wholemeal Pitta has 44% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Soft wholemeal pittas has 11% more fiber (8.1 g vs 7.2 g).

Ingredients

Wholemeal Pitta

Wholemeal Wheatflour (contains Gluten), Water, Yeast, Vinegar, Salt, Preservative: E282, Wheat Starch (contains Gluten).

Soft wholemeal pittas

Wholemeal Wheat Flour, Water, Yeast, Salt, Spirit Vinegar, Preservative: Calcium Propionate; Wheat Starch.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Wholemeal Pitta or Soft wholemeal pittas?

Overall, Soft wholemeal pittas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wholemeal Pitta has fewer calories: 232 kcal versus 237 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Soft wholemeal pittas has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons