Weetabix vs Graanontbijt appel en rozijn
Overall, Weetabix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Weetabix | Graanontbijt appel en rozijn |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 362 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 1.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 27 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | 8.1 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 8.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Graanontbijt appel en rozijn has 15% less fat (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Weetabix has 84% less sugar (4.2 g vs 27 g).
- Weetabix has 19% more fiber (10 g vs 8.1 g).
- Weetabix has 31% more protein (12 g vs 8.3 g).
- Weetabix has the better Nutri-Score.
- Weetabix is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Weetabix
Blé complet 95%, extrait de malt, sucre, sel 0,3%
Graanontbijt appel en rozijn
Volkoren TARWEMEEL, rozijnen 10%, suiker 10%, appel 4,2%, druivensuiker 2,5%, zout, aroma, vitaminen (B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, C en E), mineralen (magnesium, ijzer)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Weetabix or Graanontbijt appel en rozijn?
Overall, Weetabix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Graanontbijt appel en rozijn has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 362 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Weetabix has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 27 g per 100 g.