Comparison
Weetabix vs Brinta
Overall, Brinta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Weetabix | Brinta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 362 kcal | 345 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 2.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 5.6 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | 11 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Brinta has 50% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
- Weetabix has 25% less sugar (4.2 g vs 5.6 g).
- Brinta has 20% more protein (15 g vs 12 g).
- Brinta is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Weetabix
Blé complet 95%, extrait de malt, sucre, sel 0,3%
Brinta
Volkoren tarwemeel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Weetabix or Brinta?
Overall, Brinta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Brinta has fewer calories: 345 kcal versus 362 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Weetabix has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 5.6 g per 100 g.