Wafle gryczane sól morska & chia vs Gallette di grano saraceno
Overall, Gallette di grano saraceno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Wafle gryczane sól morska & chia
Gallette di grano saraceno
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wafle gryczane sól morska &... | Gallette di grano saraceno |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 371 kcal | 352 kcal |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 3.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 5.5 g | 10 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wafle gryczane sól morska & chia has 31% less fat (2.7 g vs 3.9 g).
- Wafle gryczane sól morska & chia has 61% less sugar (1.1 g vs 2.8 g).
- Gallette di grano saraceno has 82% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Gallette di grano saraceno has 45% more fiber (10 g vs 5.5 g).
- Gallette di grano saraceno has 29% more protein (14 g vs 10 g).
- Gallette di grano saraceno is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Gallette di grano saraceno lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Wafle gryczane sól morska & chia
Kasza gryczana prażona 51%, grys kukurydziany, chia (szałwia hiszpańska) 29%, sól morska 0,5%
Gallette di grano saraceno
100% Grano Saraceno* (*) ingrediente biologico - Allergeni: PUÒ CONTENERE TRACCE DI SOIA
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wafle gryczane sól morska & chia or Gallette di grano saraceno?
Overall, Gallette di grano saraceno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gallette di grano saraceno has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 371 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wafle gryczane sól morska & chia has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.