Comparison

Vitarmonyl Magnesium 2X12 Comprimes vs Protein Shake Raspberry

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVitarmonyl Magnesium 2X12 Co...Protein Shake Raspberry
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 6 kcal 348 kcal
Fat — 7.8 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.6 g
Sugars 0 g 19 g
Salt 0.3 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 27 g
Protein 0 g 33 g
Additives80
AllergensNone listedNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Vitarmonyl Magnesium 2X12 Comprimes has 98% fewer calories (6 kcal vs 348 kcal).
  • Vitarmonyl Magnesium 2X12 Comprimes has no saturated fat, while Protein Shake Raspberry has 0.6 g.
  • Vitarmonyl Magnesium 2X12 Comprimes has no sugar, while Protein Shake Raspberry has 19 g.
  • Protein Shake Raspberry has 100% more fiber (27 g vs 0 g).
  • Protein Shake Raspberry has 100% more protein (33 g vs 0 g).
  • Protein Shake Raspberry is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Protein Shake Raspberry lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Vitarmonyl Magnesium 2X12 Comprimes

Édulcorant : sorbitol ; acidifiant : acide citrique ; minéral:oxyde de magnésium ; correcteur d'acidité : bicarbonate de sodium ; arôme naturel d'orange : : polyéthylène glycol: support édulcorant : saccharine ; vitamine B6 : vitamine B2; vitamine B1:édulcorants: acésulfame de potassium, glycosides de stéviol.

Protein Shake Raspberry

mandelproteinpulver, himbeerpulver, Dattelpulver

FAQ

Which is healthier: Vitarmonyl Magnesium 2X12 Comprimes or Protein Shake Raspberry?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Vitarmonyl Magnesium 2X12 Comprimes has fewer calories: 6 kcal versus 348 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Vitarmonyl Magnesium 2X12 Comprimes has less sugar: 0 g versus 19 g per 100 g.

More comparisons