Viande de Bœuf Séchée vs Cecina
Overall, Viande de Bœuf Séchée has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Viande de Bœuf Séchée
Cecina
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Viande de Bœuf Séchée | Cecina |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 187 kcal | 206 kcal |
| Fat | 4.5 g | 7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 4.1 g | 4.5 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 36 g | 35 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Viande de Bœuf Séchée has 36% less fat (4.5 g vs 7 g).
- Viande de Bœuf Séchée has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Cecina is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Viande de Bœuf Séchée
Viande de bœuf, sel, dextrose, arômes naturels, conservateurs : nitrite de sodium et nitrate de sodium. Viande de bœuf origine Union Européenne.
Cecina
Carne de vacuno, sal, azúcar, corrector de la acidez E-331, conservadores E-252 y E-250. Utilizados 170 g de carne para 100g de producto final.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Viande de Bœuf Séchée or Cecina?
Overall, Viande de Bœuf Séchée has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Viande de Bœuf Séchée has fewer calories: 187 kcal versus 206 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Viande de Bœuf Séchée has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.