Comparison

Archer Original Beef Stick Mini vs Cecina

Overall, Cecina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientArcher Original Beef Stick M...Cecina
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 321 kcal 206 kcal
Fat 21.4 g 7 g
Saturated fat 10.7 g 2.1 g
Sugars 0 g 0.8 g
Salt 3.6 g 4.5 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 28.6 g 35 g
Additives11
AllergensCeleryNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cecina has 36% fewer calories (206 kcal vs 321 kcal).
  • Cecina has 67% less fat (7 g vs 21.4 g).
  • Cecina has 80% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 10.7 g).
  • Archer Original Beef Stick Mini has no sugar, while Cecina has 0.8 g.
  • Archer Original Beef Stick Mini has 21% less salt (3.6 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Cecina has 18% more protein (35 g vs 28.6 g).
  • Only Archer Original Beef Stick Mini lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Archer Original Beef Stick Mini

Grass-Fed Beef, Water, Sea Salt, Contains 2% Or Less: Encapsulated Citric Acid, Dehydrated Garlic, Red Pepper, Black Pepper, Cultured Celery Powder, Cherry Powder, Coriander, Onion Powder, White Pepper, Ground Nutmeg, Parsley, In Colored Beef Collagen Casing.

Cecina

Carne de vacuno, sal, azúcar, corrector de la acidez E-331, conservadores E-252 y E-250. Utilizados 170 g de carne para 100g de producto final.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Archer Original Beef Stick Mini or Cecina?

Overall, Cecina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cecina has fewer calories: 206 kcal versus 321 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Archer Original Beef Stick Mini has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons