Beef jerky vs Cecina
Overall, Cecina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Beef jerky | Cecina |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 253 kcal | 206 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 18 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 5 g | 4.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 35 g | 35 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Blé | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cecina has 19% fewer calories (206 kcal vs 253 kcal).
- Beef jerky has 50% less fat (3.5 g vs 7 g).
- Beef jerky has 29% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 2.1 g).
- Cecina has 96% less sugar (0.8 g vs 18 g).
- Cecina has 10% less salt (4.5 g vs 5 g).
- Cecina is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Beef jerky lists: Gluten, Blé.
Ingredients
Beef jerky
Viande de boeuf, sucre, sel, sauce fe soja en poudre (blé, graines de soja maltodextrine), protéine de maïs hydrolysée, extrait de levure, épices, sel nitrité pour saumure (sel, conservateur : nitrite de sodium), antioxydant extrait e romarin, correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique, arôme de fumée.
Cecina
Carne de vacuno, sal, azúcar, corrector de la acidez E-331, conservadores E-252 y E-250. Utilizados 170 g de carne para 100g de producto final.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Beef jerky or Cecina?
Overall, Cecina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cecina has fewer calories: 206 kcal versus 253 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cecina has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 18 g per 100 g.