Viande de grisons vs Cecina
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Viande de grisons | Cecina |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 194 kcal | 206 kcal |
| Fat | 4 g | 7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 4.5 g | 4.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 38 g | 35 g |
| Additives | 3 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Viande de grisons has 43% less fat (4 g vs 7 g).
- Viande de grisons has 19% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2.1 g).
- Cecina has 33% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
- Cecina is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Viande de grisons lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Viande de grisons
Viande de boeuf origine U.E. ou hors U.E. , sel, épices et plantes aromatiques, extrait d'épices, dextrose, sucre, conservateurs : ascorbate de sodium, citrates de sodium, nitrate de potassium. Présence possible de fruits à coques et de lait.
Cecina
Carne de vacuno, sal, azúcar, corrector de la acidez E-331, conservadores E-252 y E-250. Utilizados 170 g de carne para 100g de producto final.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Viande de grisons or Cecina?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Viande de grisons has fewer calories: 194 kcal versus 206 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cecina has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.