Vermicelles vs Shirstaki
Overall, Shirstaki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vermicelles | Shirstaki |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 10 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Shirstaki has 97% fewer calories (10 kcal vs 350 kcal).
- Vermicelles has 50% more protein (1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Shirstaki has the better Nutri-Score.
- Shirstaki is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Vermicelles
Fécule de pois, Fécule de mais, Fécule de haricots mungo
Shirstaki
Water, konjac flour 3%, acidity regulator (citric acid), firming agent (calcium hydroxide).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vermicelles or Shirstaki?
Overall, Shirstaki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Shirstaki has fewer calories: 10 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vermicelles has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.