Vermicelle De Soja 250G vs Shirstaki
Overall, Shirstaki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vermicelle De Soja 250G | Shirstaki |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 342 kcal | 10 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Shirstaki has 97% fewer calories (10 kcal vs 342 kcal).
- Vermicelle De Soja 250G has no fat, while Shirstaki has 0.5 g.
- Vermicelle De Soja 250G has no sugar, while Shirstaki has 0.5 g.
- Vermicelle De Soja 250G has 67% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.5 g).
- Shirstaki has the better Nutri-Score.
- Shirstaki is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Vermicelle De Soja 250G lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Vermicelle De Soja 250G
Amidon de haricot mungo, amidon de pois, eau
Shirstaki
Water, konjac flour 3%, acidity regulator (citric acid), firming agent (calcium hydroxide).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vermicelle De Soja 250G or Shirstaki?
Overall, Shirstaki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Shirstaki has fewer calories: 10 kcal versus 342 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vermicelle De Soja 250G has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.